Enjl wrote:Why does sorel need tldrs for one line reviews?
That's super nitpicky and you know it.
The point of the review is to gice extended thoughts that ideally justify your score ranking of the entires. If half of a review is a summary of the other half and neither half really says much, I'm having trouble reading this justification. It wouldn't have hurt the reviews to go more in-depth and discard the idea of tldr-ing them, because if someone wants to have the feedback, they will read it. If they don't, they'll skip the tldr too.
And no, that was not super nitpicky and I didn't think it was. It's a concern I have because I've been judging and seeing others judge things for years and I've never seen someone do tldrs amost as long as their reviews.
E: haha 'most minor of things' as in 'shortest reviews ever'
I'm not saying Sorel should never be picked up as a judge again because of half-assed execution on the criticism front, but if you call this nitpicking then you might aswell encourage your judges to stop writing text reviews entirely (which can work, but does make it harder for people to get into a judge's head)