Page 6 of 9
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:37 pm
by aero
penguin21 wrote:Really? . I am 56 XD
[ragont grumbling in the distance]
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 7:46 pm
by Axiom
205 though not bad
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:13 pm
by Navi
Hmm let's see I'm like a week late.
Wow! I'm there! (imsointerested)
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:41 am
by Dragonmaster146
I'm surprised i'm not in it.
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:16 am
by Cedrik
My signature is smaller now.
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:21 pm
by PopYoshi
It's a honor be in the third place, but I recomend update the topic, I reduced the size of my signature because is annoying have a huge image of Dio in the Palutena's body (it is funny, but is annoying too)
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:32 pm
by PixelPest
I don't think there's a need to update the topic. That would be hell to keep track of every time someone changes their sig
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:46 pm
by lighthouse64
Yeah. Not everybody will be going lower in the ranks.
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:54 pm
by PopYoshi
I understand that, it could be annoying
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:03 pm
by bayonetta
mine is a gif of cofagragus from xy and text saying it its the best pokemon does it count for 100
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:53 pm
by Mable
Yes it does
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:57 am
by Cedrik
Koopa-Fans new signature is now realy small! He's place 6543!
xD
And I think, big signatures are ok, if all is in a SPOILER!
Don't open this!
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:30 am
by FireyPaperMario
*Reads the list* I'm not on it, thank god! ^.^')
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:58 am
by Seedy Koopas
I thought my signature was the smallest!
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 12:12 pm
by Mable
Cedrik wrote:Koopa-Fans new signature is now realy small! He's place 6543!
xD
And I think, big signatures are ok, if all is in a SPOILER!
Don't open this!
From a scala from 0-10 how funny do you think you are?
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 12:23 pm
by Cedrik
Tinkerbell wrote:Cedrik wrote:Koopa-Fans new signature is now realy small! He's place 6543!
xD
And I think, big signatures are ok, if all is in a SPOILER!
Don't open this!
From a scala from 0-10 how funny do you think you are?
3.7
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:19 pm
by h2643
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 11:10 pm
by Alagirez
Cedrik wrote:
Don't open this!
wow
∞/10
holy cedrik
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:26 am
by Cedrik
Super Mario Channel has the biggest I ever see!!!!!!!
Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:33 am
by Alagirez
Cedrik wrote:Super Mario Channel has the biggest I ever see!!!!!!!
I suggest you check this account.