What would you say if I had a copy of the Source Code??

Bj007pro · Postby **Bj007pro** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:24 am

I'm not trolling, bloating, blabbing, gloating, bragging

I may actually have the Source Code on my 1TB HDD because I remember downloading the Source Code once just so I could have a look at.
If I may have it would valtteri like it. I can get it ASAP (when I can basically get it back from my Uncle.)

Interested?

zlaker · Postby **zlaker** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:18 am

Could I have it? I need it to fix some bugs with Double Cherry.

Postby **Julia Pseudo** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:44 am

Yeah, good luck OK.

Redigit didn't ever release the SMBX source to the general public (or to anyone else that I know of, for that matter). If he had, Joey, Valtteri, or someone else who was prominent in the community during SMBX development would have it.

Basically, if you have the source, prove it by releasing it to the public.

XerX · Postby **XerX** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:48 am

I'd say you are bullshitting us like last time, or its just the 'source code' aka decompiled SMBX. Who gave you this source code anyways?

Keddy · Postby **Keddy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:09 am

I want to see the VB source files...It files would literally need to say Visual Basic Source File, Visual Basic Project File, and the rest. It's most likely the decompiled SMBX which has little to no trace of the source code.

Bj007pro · Postby **Bj007pro** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:16 am

It was released to the public one time but got brought off the internet VERY QUICKLY got taking down.

All I said was maybe, FUCK YOu if you don't wanna believe me, my uncle has my HDD because the miniUSB Port has broken off and he couldn't soldier it back so he's taking awhile to find another miniUSB Port for it, I'm sorry I just can't remember if I do/don't have it. This will take some time.
So please, find some friggen thought and give me some fucking time. IT's not my fucking fault, that my uncle has my HDD for nearly 2 Years so please once I go down to Blockhouse Bay I will ask him if I can view my fucking HDD (there's a way for HDD to be view if two separate cord with a 2.0 USB at the end of it) but till then your'll just have to fucking wait. I believe you can be patient enough to wait can you guys?!
so FUCK YOU for not believing me.

Keddy · Postby **Keddy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:02 am

Sorry If we come off skeptic, we've seen lots of so called "source codes". Also, you don't have to use a USB port, you can go oldschool and use the CD-R Drive. just slip in a blank CD-R, when autoplay asks, say format for data and write the source code on it. I'm assuming it isn't connected to the internet other wise you could just upload it...

Postby **Julia Pseudo** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:31 pm

Bj007pro wrote:It was released to the public one time but got brought off the internet VERY QUICKLY got taking down.

All I said was maybe, FUCK YOu if you don't wanna believe me, my uncle has my HDD because the miniUSB Port has broken off and he couldn't soldier it back so he's taking awhile to find another miniUSB Port for it, I'm sorry I just can't remember if I do/don't have it. This will take some time.
So please, find some friggen thought and give me some fucking time. IT's not my fucking fault, that my uncle has my HDD for nearly 2 Years so please once I go down to Blockhouse Bay I will ask him if I can view my fucking HDD (there's a way for HDD to be view if two separate cord with a 2.0 USB at the end of it) but till then your'll just have to fucking wait. I believe you can be patient enough to wait can you guys?!
so FUCK YOU for not believing me.

Look, seriously? You cannot blame us for not believing you. People have claimed to have access to the source code or something like it many times and it didn't turn out to be the source code.

I might even believe that you believe that you have the source code. But, as other people said, it's probably the decompiled SMBX binary code, which is essentially useless for creating new content.

Also, the fact that "it was released to the public one time but got taken down VERY QUICKLY" seems like quite the likely story. Do you have a screenshot of the download or any kind of proof? Again, as I said in my first post here, if it was released for any length of time, it would've been widely circulated by now and Joey, reghrhre, Valtteri, or some other active user would have it as well. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you haven't been a part of the community that long compared to a bunch of other users (me for example). Somebody else would remember/know about a release. Can you even tell us who posted the download, or when and where it was posted?

I apologize, but you need to show us some kind of proof or else we can't believe you. Claims like this have been made too many times to be believable.

Postby **Raster** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:27 pm

The source code was never released to the public. If you want anyone to believe you post a screenshot of actual VB code (preferably from the module).

/thread

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:15 pm

You're raging at us for not believing you when you don't even have substantial evidence? That just makes us believe you even less, I hope you realize that.

Enjl · Postby **Enjl** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:47 pm

So first you're saying that you might have the source code for SMBX, trying to get as much attention as possible.
Then you're saying it might not be the case after all since something happened to your HDd and you can't check in near future.
Then you imply that there was a time where the code was leaked, which would be the classic case of 'pics or it didn't happen'. I do, however, remember, that Redigit gave a source code novody was able to use to anyone who asked him per mail.
Now, the thing is: This topic didn't do anything but make you look stupid, to be honest. If you'd have been patient and not have told us to and have had posted this when you had acess to the code, instead of trying to get attention, all this would look differently. I'd suggest we will not discuss this further, because it won't lead to anything, obviously. We'd just get into an argument, insulting each other and trying to prove each other wrong, like the SMBX community normally does. And with a new SMBX patch out on Saturday, I don't think it's that urgent that we get a fully functional source code. I'm sure it'd be better to have the code you're talking about to begin with, so I'm gonna wait for you to get acess to it, and I think the others shuld aswell.

Dragonmaster146 · Postby **Dragonmaster146** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:21 pm

What would I say? I'd say "good for you."

Chill Pingu · Postby **Chill Pingu** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:32 pm

dude nobody is idiot enough to believe you have the source code.

bambooPenArtist · Postby **bambooPenArtist** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:39 pm

guys lets no speculate until he shows proof.
I would imagine it won't be anytime soon based on what he said about the state the hdd he had it on is in... but when thats fixed we will see.